It is devastating’: how 30 confined beluga whales have become bargaining chips in conflict over inhumane treatment.
The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.
A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a defunct facility, public officials and advocacy groups.
But those most familiar with the whales say the intense debate over their fate often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who see them each day.
After the national authorities blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held warned to put them down unless the authorities pays for the expense of their survival. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain situation.
Intelligent Marine Mammals
Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and communal behavior suggest they are deeply intelligent creatures – something a former trainer observed directly.
She spent several years as a beluga trainer, a position that required gaining confidence of the marine predators.
“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”
Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so surprised by the subtleties and unique traits in their dispositions. She cultivated a deep bond for two female belugas with different personalities.
“Eve accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “They altered the way I perceive connection.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Her relationship with the whales progressed against a context of increasing societal concern to their confinement.
During her tenure at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility attributes to age-related causes, but which activists say reflects the substandard environment in which they were kept.
The facility did not admit visitors to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly results of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the pools because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”
The facility did not reply to a inquiry, but in the past claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality health care and constant attention than any individual in the Britain, or other places.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
The former employee was fired from the park in recent months following the death of a beluga, an ailing beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the facility suspected information of the death were disclosed to the media and she was released soon after.
The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s warning to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “considerable staff”, vehicles and heavy equipment.
“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
She backs calls for the whales to be taken immediately from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.
In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister rejected a bid to export the whales to an overseas location.
“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual life in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that whales are meant for the wild, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience permit an relocation that would prolong the treatment these belugas have suffered.”
But the former trainer said the official’s remarks indicate a wider lack of awareness of the realities of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The public needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As decision makers work to find a solution, ideas have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.
A planned protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The prospective site, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Advocates remain positive that it could ultimately represent a long term solution for a number of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ future.
Some experts say the idea of a refuge indicates a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the coming months.
Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the facility will simulate the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|